Dear Premier Steven Marshall and Professor Nicola Spurrier
it has come to my attention that there are many questions about the PCR process that is been used as a Covid 19 test.
In the duration of this crisis, I have received hundreds of messages from the public with many of their concerns.
To cut to the chase i will go straight to the point.
Is it true that there is no Covid 19 test and for testing we are using nothing more than an RNA amplification process ?
Is it true that after 35 amplification cycles of Covid RNA samples most tested will show them as positive cases ?
(PCR data evaluated as positive after a Ct value of 35 cycles are completely unreliable.)
Is it true that after 60 amplification cycles of the Covid RNA all samples will show as positive cases?
Is it true that there is no standard amplification cycles for this process and every city country amplifies the RNA samples as many times they want?
Is it true that the less amplification cycles of the samples show more negative results and increasing the amplification cycles shows more positive cases?
Is it true that there is no Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) available for this process?
(There should be a Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) available, which unequivocally specifies the parameters of the process, so that all laboratories are able to set up the identical same test conditions)
On the test results of every person that is been tested, is the number of amplification cycles included on their test results?
If not why not?
Here in Adelaide what is the number of amplification cycles you use?
Are all tests in Australia done the same way and use the same number of amplification cycles?
Is it true that the PCR process that is been used as a Covid 19 test can not determine infectious diseases?
Is this PCR process a gold standard test for Covid 19?
Dear Premier Steven Marshall and Professor Nicola Spurrier, in Adelaide how many times are you amplifying the RNA samples of our citizens?
From the start of this pandemic have you maintained the same number of amplification cycles for this process?
How does the PCR Covid 19 test work?
As this test has determent all of your decisions, lock downs hard restrictions, loss of our freedom loss of health mentally/physically and for most of us loss of our livelihoods , it is very important for both of you to respond immediately!
At the same time if it is determined that this PCR process that is been used as a Covid 19 test in reality is not a test for Covid 19 and has major scientific flaws, i would request you lift immediately all restrictions and let life to go back to normal.
Since this pandemic has become an Emergency situation, forced our life in a different direction and circumvented our various rights and liberties, it is now also our right to have access to this data and detailed information related to this PCR process that is been used as a Covid 19 test. The public are entitled to know!
I will kindly request this vital information to be publicly released by you within 7 days, and then maintained on any relevant government websites.
Should this request be ignored, I will seek legal recourse for this purpose.
For your viewing i have attached a link with one of many reports about this PCR process.
Review report Corman-Drosten CURATED BY AN INTERNATIONAL CONSORTIUM OF SCIENTISTS IN LIFE SCIENCES (ICSLS)
Subject: External Review and request to retract the paper of Corman et al, published in Eurosurveillance January 23, 2020
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
This paper will show numerous serious flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19.
Doctors
Pieter Borger(1), Bobby Rajesh Malhotra(2) , Michael Yeadon(3) , Clare Craig(4), Kevin McKernan(5) , Klaus Steger(6) , Paul McSheehy(7) , Lidiya Angelova(8), Fabio Franchi(9), Thomas Binder(10), Henrik Ullrich(11) , Makoto Ohashi(12), Stefano Scoglio(13), Marjolein Doesburg-van Kleffens(14), Dorothea Gilbert(15), Rainer Klement(16), Ruth Schruefer(17), Berber W. Pieksma(18), Jan Bonte(19), Bruno H. Dalle Carbonare(20), Kevin P. Corbett(21), Ulrike Kämmerer(22)
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
Steven Kelly
Site: www.stevenkelly.com.au
Contact: www.stevenkelly.com.au/contact
Attention
To Public Servants, Mayors and Council Officials Please share my request .
Sandy Verschoor – Lord Mayor of Adelaide
Mary Couros
You have been entrusted by the people to act on their behalf, their well-being, their prosperity. No matter your role, duty and responsibility, you have to get involved and contribute towards clarity, transparency and do what is in your power to relieve the people. If not, your silence can be taken as being complicit to the fear and confusion that exists. We need leaders not followers.
To Australian Doctors & Health Scientists
Please activate! Get involved investigate this and put your experience and knowledge to use.
To Media Outlets
Due to the importance and critical times we are living in, now more than ever we need you. Please investigate this matter as it is of much importance.
To politicians Peter Malinauskas
I expect you to ask questions investigate and scrutinized this PCR process that is been used as a Covid 19 test,
then share your findings with us.
Lastly,
I would like to ask any health scientists, doctors, lawyers, news media companies etc. that can contribute toward investigating this and other involving this crisis , please contact me at www.stevenkelly.com.au/contact/
Scott Morrison (ScoMo) ,Sky News Australia,
7NEWS Australia, Channel 9, InDaily, A Current Affair,
The Advertiser, news.com.au, ABC Australia, Channel 10,
9 News, 7NEWS Adelaide, 9 News Central Queensland,
9 News Melbourne, 7NEWS Sydney, 7NEWS Melbourne,
9 News Sydney, Daily Mail Australia, Daily Mail Australia,
9 News Perth, Martin Haese,City of Adelaide, SA Health
